Cloud Provider Security Review Examples
Cloud provider security reviews follow a risk-tiered approach: critical providers undergo quarterly assessments with penetration testing and SOC 2 validation, while standard providers receive annual questionnaires and automated monitoring. Success depends on mapping provider controls to your specific attack surface and maintaining continuous monitoring post-onboarding.
Key takeaways:
- Risk tier determines review depth (critical = quarterly deep dives, standard = annual assessments)
- Automated tools catch most issues before manual review
- Shadow IT discovery reveals 30-a significant number of more cloud exposure than reported
- Multi-cloud environments require unified control mapping
- Incident response alignment saves 48-72 hours during breaches
Managing cloud provider security presents unique challenges compared to traditional vendor reviews. Unlike on-premise software vendors, cloud providers control your data infrastructure, access management, and often your disaster recovery capabilities. The shared responsibility model creates gray areas where security ownership blurs between your organization and the provider.
Most organizations discover they're using 3-4x more cloud services than IT officially tracks. A financial services CISO recently found 127 cloud applications in use after security initially reported 34. Each represents potential data exposure, compliance gaps, and attack vectors into your environment.
This guide walks through real-world cloud provider security reviews, from initial discovery through continuous monitoring. Examples cover AWS migrations, multi-cloud architectures, and specialized SaaS providers, showing what worked and what failed in actual implementations.
The Multi-Cloud Financial Services Migration
A regional bank's cloud transformation provides a textbook example of comprehensive provider review. Starting with 400+ on-premise applications, they planned migration to AWS (primary) and Azure (disaster recovery).
Initial Discovery Phase
The security team began with automated discovery tools scanning for:
- OAuth connections to cloud services
- CASB logs showing data transfers
- DNS queries to known cloud providers
- Employee expense reports for SaaS subscriptions
Discovery revealed 89 unauthorized cloud services already in use, including:
- 12 file sharing platforms
- 23 project management tools
- 8 code repositories
- 46 department-specific SaaS applications
Risk Tiering Process
The bank classified providers into four tiers:
Tier 1 - Critical Infrastructure
- AWS (primary compute/storage)
- Azure (DR and backup)
- Snowflake (data warehouse)
Tier 2 - Sensitive Data Processors
- Salesforce (customer data)
- Workday (employee data)
- Box (document management)
Tier 3 - Business Operations
- Slack
- Zoom
- Monday.com
Tier 4 - Limited Access
- Marketing tools
- Survey platforms
- Training systems
Assessment Methodology by Tier
Tier 1 Reviews (Quarterly)
- Architecture review with provider solutions architects
- Penetration testing of configured environments
- Configuration baseline audits
- Access key rotation verification
- Incident response tabletop exercises
- Compliance artifact validation (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS)
Tier 2 Reviews (Semi-Annual)
- Security questionnaire (300+ questions)
- SOC 2 Type II report analysis
- Data flow mapping
- API security testing
- Third-party sub-processor reviews
Tier 3 Reviews (Annual)
- Standard questionnaire (150 questions)
- Automated vulnerability scanning
- Access review
- Terms of service analysis
Tier 4 Reviews (At Onboarding)
- Basic questionnaire (50 questions)
- Data classification confirmation
- Acceptable use verification
Healthcare System's AWS Security Deep Dive
A 12-hospital system's AWS migration demonstrates advanced cloud provider assessment. Processing 2.5M patient records required HIPAA compliance across all services.
Pre-Migration Security Architecture
The security team built a reference architecture addressing:
- Network segmentation between hospitals
- PHI encryption at rest and in transit
- Access control with assumed roles
- Logging and monitoring integration
- Backup and recovery procedures
Continuous Monitoring Implementation
Post-migration monitoring caught several critical issues:
Month 1: S3 bucket accidentally made public (caught in 6 minutes) Month 3: IAM role with excessive permissions (automated remediation) Month 6: Unencrypted EBS volume creation (blocked by policy) Month 9: Cross-account access from terminated employee (revoked within hour)
The team implemented:
- AWS Config rules checking 200+ security controls
- CloudTrail analysis for anomalous API calls
- GuardDuty for threat detection
- Security Hub for centralized findings
- Custom Lambda functions for auto-remediation
Key Findings
- Configuration drift occurs within weeks without automation
- Developer workarounds create a large share of security exceptions
- Cost optimization often conflicts with security (e.g., removing "unused" security groups)
- Multi-account strategy essential for proper segmentation
SaaS Provider Assessment: Marketing Tech Stack
A retail company's marketing technology review shows typical SaaS security challenges. Marketing had independently purchased 34 cloud services processing customer data.
Discovery and Inventory
The security team found:
- 12 services with customer PII
- 8 sharing data between platforms
- 23 without IT knowledge
- 5 processing payment information
- 3 already breached in previous year
Risk Assessment Framework
Each provider evaluated against:
Data Handling
- Types of data processed
- Data retention periods
- Deletion capabilities
- Export functionality
- Sub-processor usage
Security Controls
- Authentication methods
- Encryption standards
- Vulnerability management
- Incident response SLAs
- Compliance certifications
Integration Risks
- API security
- Data sharing agreements
- Third-party plugins
- Browser extensions
- Mobile app permissions
Remediation Actions
Immediate (Week 1)
- Disabled 5 high-risk services
- Implemented SSO for 18 services
- Removed payment data from 3 platforms
Short-term (Month 1)
- Consolidated to 12 approved providers
- Implemented DLP policies
- Created data handling agreements
- Established quarterly reviews
Long-term (Quarter 1)
- Built approved vendor list
- Created self-service portal
- Automated security assessments
- Implemented CASB monitoring
Lessons from Cloud Provider Breaches
Analysis of recent cloud provider security incidents reveals common patterns:
Configuration Error Patterns
- Default Settings: most breaches involve default configurations
- Permission Creep: Access rights expand 3x annually without reviews
- Abandoned Resources: a significant number of cloud resources are orphaned
- Key Rotation: a large share of access keys are never rotated
Effective Controls
Technical Controls
- Infrastructure as Code for consistent configurations
- Policy as Code for automated enforcement
- Continuous compliance scanning
- Automated remediation workflows
Process Controls
- Monthly access reviews
- Quarterly architecture reviews
- Annual penetration testing
- Incident response exercises
Contractual Controls
- Right to audit clauses
- Breach notification SLAs (24-48 hours)
- Data location restrictions
- Liability caps and insurance requirements
Frequently Asked Questions
How often should we review critical cloud provider security?
Critical providers need quarterly technical reviews and continuous automated monitoring. Annual assessments miss configuration drift and new vulnerabilities.
What's the minimum security documentation needed from cloud providers?
SOC 2 Type II report, penetration test results from last 12 months, and architecture diagrams showing data flows and security controls.
How do we assess cloud providers who won't fill out questionnaires?
Use their SOC 2 report to answer 60-most questions, supplement with public documentation, and flag gaps as risks in your assessment.
Should we require cyber insurance from all cloud providers?
Require cyber insurance for Tier 1-2 providers processing sensitive data. Minimum coverage should equal potential breach costs (typically $5M-$50M).
How do we handle cloud providers with poor security postures but business necessity?
Implement compensating controls: additional monitoring, data minimization, increased audit frequency, and restricted access with explicit risk acceptance from leadership.
What automation tools work best for cloud security monitoring?
Native tools (AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center) for basic monitoring, supplemented with cloud-native application protection platforms (CNAPP) for advanced detection.
How do we track shadow IT cloud usage?
Deploy CASB solutions monitoring network traffic, analyze expense reports for subscriptions, review OAuth authorizations, and scan DNS logs for cloud provider domains.
Frequently Asked Questions
How often should we review critical cloud provider security?
Critical providers need quarterly technical reviews and continuous automated monitoring. Annual assessments miss configuration drift and new vulnerabilities.
What's the minimum security documentation needed from cloud providers?
SOC 2 Type II report, penetration test results from last 12 months, and architecture diagrams showing data flows and security controls.
How do we assess cloud providers who won't fill out questionnaires?
Use their SOC 2 report to answer 60-70% of questions, supplement with public documentation, and flag gaps as risks in your assessment.
Should we require cyber insurance from all cloud providers?
Require cyber insurance for Tier 1-2 providers processing sensitive data. Minimum coverage should equal potential breach costs (typically $5M-$50M).
How do we handle cloud providers with poor security postures but business necessity?
Implement compensating controls: additional monitoring, data minimization, increased audit frequency, and restricted access with explicit risk acceptance from leadership.
What automation tools work best for cloud security monitoring?
Native tools (AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center) for basic monitoring, supplemented with cloud-native application protection platforms (CNAPP) for advanced detection.
How do we track shadow IT cloud usage?
Deploy CASB solutions monitoring network traffic, analyze expense reports for subscriptions, review OAuth authorizations, and scan DNS logs for cloud provider domains.
See how Daydream handles this
The scenarios above are exactly what Daydream automates. See it in action.
Get a Demo