What is Incident Response Plan

An Incident Response Plan (IRP) is a documented set of procedures that defines how your organization detects, responds to, and recovers from security incidents affecting your systems and third-party vendors. The plan establishes clear roles, communication protocols, and technical steps to minimize damage, preserve evidence, and restore normal operations within defined recovery time objectives (RTOs).

Key takeaways:

  • Required by SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR Article 33, and most industry frameworks
  • Must include vendor-specific procedures for supply chain incidents
  • Requires annual testing and updates based on lessons learned
  • Should map to your risk register and control framework
  • Testing evidence becomes critical audit documentation

Your incident response plan serves as the operational playbook when security events threaten your organization or vendor ecosystem. For GRC analysts and compliance officers, the IRP represents both a regulatory requirement and a critical control that bridges multiple frameworks—from SOC 2's CC7.4 to ISO 27001's Clause 16.

The challenge lies in building a plan that satisfies diverse regulatory requirements while remaining executable during high-stress incidents. Most organizations maintain separate runbooks for internal incidents versus third-party breaches, but regulatory convergence increasingly demands integrated response procedures. Your IRP must address notification timelines (72 hours under GDPR), evidence preservation requirements, and communication protocols that span internal teams, affected vendors, customers, and regulators.

Modern IRPs extend beyond traditional IT security response. They encompass business continuity, legal obligations, public relations, and vendor management workflows. The plan becomes your primary artifact during regulatory audits, demonstrating both preventive controls and your organization's capacity to limit damage when controls fail.

Core Components of an Incident Response Plan

Every IRP requires six fundamental elements that map directly to NIST's incident response lifecycle (NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2):

1. Preparation Phase Documentation

  • Asset inventory with criticality ratings
  • Contact lists for incident response team members
  • Escalation thresholds and decision matrices
  • Pre-approved communication templates
  • Evidence collection procedures and chain of custody forms

2. Detection and Analysis Procedures Your detection mechanisms must cover both internal systems and vendor environments. This includes:

  • SIEM alert thresholds and correlation rules
  • Vendor security notification procedures
  • Triage criteria for incident severity (P1-P4)
  • False positive identification workflows
  • Initial evidence gathering checklists

3. Containment, Eradication, and Recovery Steps Technical response procedures vary by incident type but should include:

  • Network isolation procedures
  • Credential rotation workflows
  • Malware removal verification steps
  • System restoration from backups
  • Vendor access revocation procedures

Regulatory Requirements and Framework Mapping

SOC 2 Requirements

SOC 2 Type II audits evaluate your IRP under Trust Services Criteria CC7.4 (Monitoring Activities) and CC7.5 (Remediation). Auditors specifically examine:

  • Documented escalation procedures
  • Evidence of annual plan testing
  • Root cause analysis documentation
  • Corrective action tracking

ISO 27001:2022 Alignment

Clause 16 (Information Security Incident Management) mandates:

  • Defined responsibilities and competencies
  • Incident reporting procedures within agreed timescales
  • Evidence collection aligned with legal requirements
  • Post-incident reviews feeding into continual improvement

GDPR Article 33 Obligations

Personal data breaches trigger strict requirements:

  • 72-hour notification to supervisory authorities
  • Documentation of breach facts, effects, and remediation
  • Customer notification procedures when high risk exists
  • Vendor processor breach notification within 48 hours

Industry-Specific Mandates

Financial Services (FFIEC): Requires board-approved IRPs with annual testing Healthcare (HIPAA): 60-day breach notification with specific content requirements PCI DSS 12.10: Mandates quarterly IRP testing and 24/7 incident response capability

Third-Party Risk Integration

Vendor incidents demand specialized procedures beyond standard internal response:

Vendor Classification Impact Critical vendors require dedicated runbooks with:

  • Direct escalation contacts (beyond standard support)
  • Pre-negotiated SLAs for incident notification
  • Joint investigation procedures
  • Coordinated public communication protocols

Supply Chain Incident Workflows When vendors experience breaches:

  1. Activate vendor-specific communication trees
  2. Assess data exposure through integration points
  3. Review access logs for lateral movement indicators
  4. Execute contingency plans for service disruption
  5. Document timeline for regulatory reporting

Contractual Enforcement Your IRP should reference:

  • Right-to-audit clauses activation procedures
  • Breach notification timeline enforcement
  • Evidence preservation requirements
  • Liability and indemnification triggers

Testing and Maintenance Requirements

Regulatory frameworks universally require IRP testing, but frequency and depth vary:

Tabletop Exercises (Quarterly)

  • Scenario-based walkthroughs with key stakeholders
  • Focus on decision points and communication flows
  • Document gaps and update procedures accordingly

Technical Simulations (Annually)

  • Red team exercises targeting specific attack vectors
  • Include vendor compromise scenarios
  • Measure actual response times against RTOs
  • Validate technical containment procedures

Full-Scale Tests (Every 18-24 months)

  • Activate entire response team
  • Include external stakeholders (legal, PR, vendors)
  • Test backup restoration procedures
  • Validate regulatory notification workflows

Common Implementation Pitfalls

Outdated Contact Information Response teams change. Vendor contacts move. Phone numbers become invalid. Quarterly contact validation prevents critical delays during actual incidents.

Undefined Severity Thresholds Without clear P1-P4 definitions tied to business impact, every event becomes "critical." Define thresholds based on:

  • Data classification affected
  • Number of records exposed
  • System criticality ratings
  • Regulatory notification triggers

Missing Vendor Dependencies Most IRPs focus on internal systems while ignoring vendor dependencies. Map critical business processes to supporting vendors, then build response procedures for each dependency.

Insufficient Legal Integration Legal counsel needs early involvement to:

  • Preserve attorney-client privilege
  • Guide evidence collection procedures
  • Approve external communications
  • Manage regulatory notifications

Frequently Asked Questions

How detailed should vendor-specific runbooks be within our IRP?

Critical vendors (those processing sensitive data or supporting essential functions) need dedicated runbooks with specific contacts, escalation paths, and service restoration procedures. Lower-tier vendors can share templated response procedures.

What's the minimum testing frequency to satisfy regulatory requirements?

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 require annual testing as a baseline. Financial services under FFIEC need quarterly tabletop exercises. PCI DSS mandates testing at least annually and after significant changes.

Should our IRP include specific forensics tools and techniques?

Include tool categories and general procedures, but maintain detailed technical runbooks separately. Your IRP should focus on workflow and decision-making rather than step-by-step technical instructions.

How do we handle incidents spanning multiple jurisdictions with different notification requirements?

Map your data flows to jurisdictions during planning. Your IRP should include a decision matrix showing which regulations apply based on data types and locations affected. Default to the strictest timeline when multiple regulations apply.

What evidence from IRP testing do auditors typically request?

Auditors want dated test scenarios, participant attendance records, findings documentation, remediation plans with timeline commitments, and evidence that identified gaps were addressed before the next test cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions

How detailed should vendor-specific runbooks be within our IRP?

Critical vendors (those processing sensitive data or supporting essential functions) need dedicated runbooks with specific contacts, escalation paths, and service restoration procedures. Lower-tier vendors can share templated response procedures.

What's the minimum testing frequency to satisfy regulatory requirements?

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 require annual testing as a baseline. Financial services under FFIEC need quarterly tabletop exercises. PCI DSS mandates testing at least annually and after significant changes.

Should our IRP include specific forensics tools and techniques?

Include tool categories and general procedures, but maintain detailed technical runbooks separately. Your IRP should focus on workflow and decision-making rather than step-by-step technical instructions.

How do we handle incidents spanning multiple jurisdictions with different notification requirements?

Map your data flows to jurisdictions during planning. Your IRP should include a decision matrix showing which regulations apply based on data types and locations affected. Default to the strictest timeline when multiple regulations apply.

What evidence from IRP testing do auditors typically request?

Auditors want dated test scenarios, participant attendance records, findings documentation, remediation plans with timeline commitments, and evidence that identified gaps were addressed before the next test cycle.

Put this knowledge to work

Daydream operationalizes compliance concepts into automated third-party risk workflows.

See the Platform