Vendor Risk Quarterly Review Template
A Vendor Risk Quarterly Review Template is a structured assessment framework that captures control effectiveness, incident data, and performance metrics at 90-day intervals. It automates evidence collection for high-risk vendors and triggers remediation workflows when controls drift from baseline requirements.
Key takeaways:
- Maps directly to SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria and ISO 27001 control objectives
- Reduces quarterly review time from 8 hours to 2 hours per critical vendor
- Standardizes evidence collection across business units
- Triggers automatic risk score recalculations based on performance degradation
- Integrates with existing GRC platforms via API or CSV import
Get this template
Quarterly risk snapshot with quarter-over-quarter risk trends, new and closed findings summary, upcoming assessment schedule
Your critical vendors change. Their security posture shifts, key personnel leave, subcontractor relationships evolve. Annual assessments miss these changes for 364 days.
Quarterly vendor reviews bridge this gap. They're lightweight touchpoints that validate control effectiveness between comprehensive annual assessments. Think of them as continuous monitoring checkpoints — not full DDQs, but targeted evidence collection focused on what changed since last quarter.
The challenge? Manual quarterly reviews consume 6-10 hours per vendor. Multiply that by 50+ critical vendors, and you're looking at 300-500 hours of work every quarter. That's why most TPRM programs skip quarterly reviews entirely, leaving risk exposure undetected until the next annual cycle.
A properly structured quarterly review template reduces this burden to 2 hours per vendor while increasing detection rates for control failures, fourth-party changes, and emerging risks. The template enforces consistent evidence collection, automates risk scoring updates, and creates an audit trail that satisfies regulatory requirements.
Core Template Components
1. Vendor Identification Block
Start with basics that link to your vendor master record:
- Legal entity name and DBA
- Vendor ID (from your VRM system)
- Contract expiration date
- Primary service category
- Current inherent risk tier
- Last full assessment date
This section takes 2 minutes but prevents the most common error: reviewing the wrong entity or outdated contract terms.
2. Control Validation Matrix
The heart of your quarterly review focuses on controls that typically drift:
| Control Domain | Evidence Required | Validation Method | Frequency of Drift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access Management | User access review logs | Screenshot of last 90 days | 73% quarterly change |
| Incident Response | Incident register | Export with severity ratings | 45% quarterly change |
| BCP Testing | Test results summary | Dated test reports | 38% quarterly change |
| Patch Management | Vulnerability scan results | Dashboard export | 92% quarterly change |
| Employee Training | Completion certificates | HR system export | 67% quarterly change |
Focus on controls with high drift rates. Skip static controls like physical security unless you have specific concerns.
3. Performance Metrics Dashboard
Quantitative metrics reveal trends before they become incidents:
Availability Metrics
- Uptime percentage (target vs actual)
- Planned maintenance windows
- Unplanned outages (count and duration)
- RTO/RPO achievement rates
Security Metrics
- Security incidents reported
- Mean time to patch critical vulnerabilities
- Failed security scans
- Phishing test failure rates
Compliance Metrics
- SLA breaches
- Audit findings (internal and external)
- Certification status changes
- Regulatory violations or fines
4. Fourth-Party Risk Assessment
Vendors rarely volunteer subcontractor changes. Your template must explicitly ask:
- New subcontractors added this quarter
- Subcontractors removed or changed
- Material changes to existing subcontractor scope
- Geographic location changes for data processing
Include a declaration requirement: "Vendor certifies no material fourth-party changes except those listed above."
5. Incident and Issue Log
Structure this section to capture both reported and detected issues:
[Incident ID] | [Date] | [Severity] | [Description] | [Root Cause] | [Remediation Status]
Require vendors to report:
- Security incidents (even if contained)
- Data breaches (including near-misses)
- Regulatory inquiries or investigations
- Service disruptions exceeding 4 hours
- Employee terminations in sensitive roles
Industry-Specific Applications
Financial Services
Add sections for:
- GLBA Safeguards Rule compliance updates
- Changes to data retention practices
- Updates to business continuity testing (FFIEC requirements)
- Concentration risk indicators
- Model risk management updates (SR 11-7 compliance)
Reference: Federal Reserve SR Letter 13-19 requires ongoing monitoring of critical service providers.
Healthcare
Include HIPAA-specific validations:
- Workforce training updates (45 CFR 164.308(a)(5))
- Access control reviews for ePHI systems
- Encryption status for data at rest and in transit
- BAA compliance confirmations
- Breach notification history
Technology Sector
Focus on:
- API security updates
- Open source component vulnerabilities
- Cloud infrastructure changes
- DevSecOps pipeline modifications
- Third-party code audit results
Compliance Framework Alignment
Your quarterly review template should map to specific framework requirements:
SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria
- CC2.2: Board oversight of vendor performance
- CC3.2: Risk assessment updates
- CC9.2: Vendor performance monitoring
- A1.1: Availability commitments
ISO 27001:2022
- Clause 15.1: Supplier relationships
- Clause 15.2: Supplier service delivery management
- Control A.15.2.1: Monitoring supplier services
- Control A.15.2.2: Managing supplier service changes
GDPR Article 28
- Processor compliance verification
- Sub-processor approval tracking
- Data location confirmations
- Cross-border transfer mechanism updates
Implementation Best Practices
1. Risk-Based Review Frequency
Not all vendors need quarterly reviews. Apply this tiering:
| Risk Tier | Review Frequency | Review Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Quarterly | Full template |
| High | Quarterly | 75% of sections |
| Medium | Semi-annually | 50% of sections |
| Low | Annually | Annual assessment only |
2. Automation Opportunities
- Pre-populate vendor data from your VRM system
- Use APIs to pull performance metrics automatically
- Set up email reminders 30 days before review dates
- Create Power BI dashboards for trend analysis
- Implement automatic risk score recalculation
3. Evidence Storage Structure
Organize quarterly evidence in a predictable hierarchy:
/Vendor Name/
/2024/
/Q1/
/Control Evidence/
/Performance Reports/
/Issue Documentation/
/Q2/
/Q3/
/Q4/
Common Implementation Mistakes
1. Over-Engineering the Template
Teams often create 50-page quarterly reviews that nobody completes. Keep it under 10 pages. If a control hasn't changed in 8 quarters, remove it from quarterly reviews.
2. Accepting Stale Evidence
"See Q4 2023 response" isn't acceptable. Require current evidence dated within the review period. Screenshots must show system timestamps.
3. Ignoring Negative Trends
Three quarters of degrading performance requires escalation. Don't wait for SLA breaches. Your template should include automatic triggers:
- some performance degradation = management notification
- 20% degradation = remediation plan required
- a significant number of degradation = executive escalation
4. Inconsistent Scoring
Define your scoring rubric upfront:
- Green (0 points): Full compliance, all evidence provided
- Yellow (1 point): Minor gaps, remediation planned
- Red (3 points): Material gaps, immediate action required
Total scores above 10 trigger formal remediation procedures.
5. Missing the Business Context
Technical controls matter, but business changes matter more:
- Mergers and acquisitions
- Leadership changes
- Financial distress indicators
- Major client losses
- Regulatory investigations
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I determine which vendors require quarterly reviews versus annual assessments?
Use inherent risk scoring based on data sensitivity, operational criticality, and regulatory requirements. Vendors processing PII/PHI, supporting critical business functions, or representing >$1M annual spend typically require quarterly reviews.
Should quarterly reviews replace annual assessments?
No. Quarterly reviews are targeted check-ins that supplement comprehensive annual assessments. Annual assessments remain necessary for full control validation, contract reviews, and strategic relationship planning.
What's the minimum evidence required for a valid quarterly review?
At minimum, collect updated SOC reports or ISO certificates, 90-day incident logs, current insurance certificates, and performance metrics. Add risk-specific evidence based on your vendor's service type.
How do I handle vendors who refuse to participate in quarterly reviews?
Reference your contract's audit rights clause. Most agreements include ongoing monitoring provisions. For resistant vendors, start with automated data collection and publicly available information, then escalate through procurement.
Can I use the same template across all industries and vendor types?
The core template works across industries, but add industry-specific sections. Financial services vendors need GLBA sections, healthcare vendors need HIPAA components, and cloud providers need additional technical controls.
How long should vendors have to complete quarterly reviews?
Provide 15 business days for critical vendors, 20 days for others. Send reminders at day 10 and day 15. Auto-escalation triggers on day 21.
What tools integrate with quarterly review templates?
Most GRC platforms (ServiceNow, Archer, OneTrust) support custom assessment templates. For smaller programs, SharePoint forms or Google Forms work with proper security controls.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I determine which vendors require quarterly reviews versus annual assessments?
Use inherent risk scoring based on data sensitivity, operational criticality, and regulatory requirements. Vendors processing PII/PHI, supporting critical business functions, or representing >$1M annual spend typically require quarterly reviews.
Should quarterly reviews replace annual assessments?
No. Quarterly reviews are targeted check-ins that supplement comprehensive annual assessments. Annual assessments remain necessary for full control validation, contract reviews, and strategic relationship planning.
What's the minimum evidence required for a valid quarterly review?
At minimum, collect updated SOC reports or ISO certificates, 90-day incident logs, current insurance certificates, and performance metrics. Add risk-specific evidence based on your vendor's service type.
How do I handle vendors who refuse to participate in quarterly reviews?
Reference your contract's audit rights clause. Most agreements include ongoing monitoring provisions. For resistant vendors, start with automated data collection and publicly available information, then escalate through procurement.
Can I use the same template across all industries and vendor types?
The core template works across industries, but add industry-specific sections. Financial services vendors need GLBA sections, healthcare vendors need HIPAA components, and cloud providers need additional technical controls.
How long should vendors have to complete quarterly reviews?
Provide 15 business days for critical vendors, 20 days for others. Send reminders at day 10 and day 15. Auto-escalation triggers on day 21.
What tools integrate with quarterly review templates?
Most GRC platforms (ServiceNow, Archer, OneTrust) support custom assessment templates. For smaller programs, SharePoint forms or Google Forms work with proper security controls.
Automate your third-party assessments
Daydream turns these manual spreadsheets into automated, trackable workflows — with AI-prefilled questionnaires, real-time risk scoring, and continuous monitoring.
Try Daydream