CIS AWS Foundations v1.2 2.2: CloudTrail log file validation should be enabled
Enable CloudTrail log file validation on every CloudTrail trail (all AWS accounts and regions in scope) so you can detect whether delivered log files were altered or deleted after creation. Operationally, this means switching on the trail’s LogFileValidationEnabled setting, confirming it stays enabled, and retaining evidence that validation is configured and monitored over time.
Key takeaways:
- This control is about tamper-evidence for CloudTrail logs stored in S3, not about enabling CloudTrail itself.
- You need both configuration (validation enabled) and assurance (continuous detection and audit-ready evidence).
- Treat this as a baseline across all accounts/regions, with centralized ownership and drift monitoring via Security Hub (CloudTrail.4).
For a CCO, compliance officer, or GRC lead, the fastest way to operationalize the cis aws foundations v1.2 2.2: cloudtrail log file validation should be enabled requirement is to translate it into a crisp control statement: “All CloudTrail trails that deliver logs to S3 have log file validation enabled, and we can prove it continuously.” This matters because CloudTrail logs are often the first source auditors, investigators, and incident responders request. If you cannot show logs are tamper-evident, you create doubt about event integrity during investigations, customer audits, or regulator inquiries.
This page gives requirement-level guidance aligned to how AWS evaluates the control in AWS Security Hub’s CIS mapping (mapped control: CloudTrail.4) 1. It also ties back to the benchmark language so you can write policy, assign ownership, implement in AWS, and retain artifacts that withstand audit scrutiny 2.
Scope note: This requirement does not replace core logging requirements (multi-region trails, management events, S3 bucket protections). It specifically requires enabling CloudTrail’s built-in log file integrity validation and being able to demonstrate that it remains enabled.
Regulatory text
Excerpt (provided): “Implement CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark v1.2 requirement 2.2 as mapped in AWS Security Hub.” 3
Operator interpretation: You must enable CloudTrail log file validation for the CloudTrail trails in your AWS environment and manage it as an auditable control. AWS Security Hub evaluates this via CloudTrail.4 1. From an audit standpoint, “implemented” means:
- the setting is enabled on the relevant trails,
- you can show objective evidence (screenshots/CLI output/config snapshots), and
- you monitor for drift and remediate exceptions.
Plain-English interpretation (what this really requires)
CloudTrail log file validation adds cryptographic integrity checks so you can detect if a CloudTrail log file stored in S3 was changed after CloudTrail delivered it. In plain terms: you are making CloudTrail logs tamper-evident.
This requirement is satisfied when:
- Each in-scope trail has Log file validation turned on (
LogFileValidationEnabled = true). - Your logging design does not create blind spots (for example, a “main” organization trail is compliant, but a second active trail used by a workload team is not).
- You can produce proof quickly during an audit: “Here are all trails; here is the validation flag; here is our continuous control monitoring result.”
Who it applies to (entity + operational context)
Applies to:
- Any organization operating workloads in AWS and using CloudTrail for security logging 2.
- Central cloud/security teams managing baseline AWS controls across accounts, including AWS Organizations environments (common in regulated enterprises).
Operational contexts where auditors will test it:
- Multi-account environments: an org trail may exist, but individual accounts can still create additional trails. Auditors often ask how you prevent “shadow trails” from weakening baseline controls.
- Regulated workloads: financial services, healthcare, and SaaS providers under customer security reviews commonly need defensible audit logs.
- Incident response readiness: if integrity is questioned during an investigation, lack of validation becomes a governance issue even if not explicitly regulated beyond the benchmark.
What you actually need to do (step-by-step)
Step 1 — Inventory all CloudTrail trails (authoritative list)
You need a complete list of trails across accounts and regions in scope.
- In single-account: list trails in that account.
- In multi-account: run inventory centrally (recommended) and reconcile with Security Hub findings for CloudTrail.4 1.
Output you want: a table with trail name, home region, multi-region flag, S3 bucket destination, and LogFileValidationEnabled.
Step 2 — Enable log file validation on each trail
For each trail that delivers logs to S3, enable log file validation.
- Console approach: CloudTrail → Trails → select trail → Edit → enable Log file validation → Save.
- API/CLI approach: update the trail to set
EnableLogFileValidation/ verifyLogFileValidationEnabledis true.
Control design decision: decide whether to enforce this via:
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC) (preferred for drift control), or
- a baseline configuration script plus continuous monitoring.
Step 3 — Confirm Security Hub evaluation (CloudTrail.4) aligns with your inventory
Enable or review AWS Security Hub CIS checks and validate that CloudTrail.4 results match your internal inventory and expectations 1.
Practical check:
- If Security Hub says “FAILED” but you believe it’s enabled, you likely have a scoping mismatch (region, account, or a trail not covered by the org aggregation you’re using).
- If Security Hub says “PASSED” but your inventory shows an exception, treat your inventory as the “ground truth” until reconciled.
Step 4 — Put an owner and an exception process on paper
Auditors will ask “who owns this setting” and “what happens if a team changes it.”
- Owner: Cloud platform/security operations.
- Exception policy: define when exceptions are allowed (rare), how they are approved, and how they are time-bounded.
Keep it simple:
- “All production accounts must have CloudTrail log file validation enabled on all trails. Exceptions require Security approval and a compensating control, documented in the GRC system.”
Step 5 — Implement continuous monitoring and drift response
Minimum viable monitoring for this requirement:
- Detect: a scheduled check (or Security Hub) alerts if
LogFileValidationEnabledbecomes false. - Respond: ticket + automatic remediation where appropriate (for example, re-enable validation and notify trail owner).
A common operator pattern is:
- Security Hub as the control signal (CloudTrail.4) plus
- a periodic configuration snapshot stored as evidence 1.
Step 6 — Evidence pack assembly (make audit requests easy)
Create a folder (or GRC object) per audit period containing:
- Trail inventory extract
- Proof of settings
- Security Hub results
- Any exception approvals
- Change records showing validation enabled and maintained
If you use Daydream to manage control-to-evidence mapping, tie this requirement to a recurring evidence task that captures the Security Hub CloudTrail.4 status and a trail configuration export on a defined cadence. That reduces last-minute evidence scrambles and makes drift visible early.
Required evidence and artifacts to retain
Retain evidence that proves both design (the setting exists) and operation (it stays enabled).
Configuration evidence (point-in-time):
- Screenshot or export of each trail showing Log file validation = Enabled.
- CLI/API output showing
LogFileValidationEnabled: truefor each trail. - Inventory report listing all trails and their validation status.
Operational evidence (over time):
- AWS Security Hub findings history or reports for CloudTrail.4 1.
- Change management tickets or IaC pull requests that enabled validation.
- Exception approvals (if any), with scope, duration, and compensating controls.
Governance evidence:
- Cloud logging standard / policy statement referencing CIS AWS Foundations v1.2 alignment 2.
- Control owner assignment (RACI) and runbook for remediation.
Common exam/audit questions and hangups
Use these to prep your audit narrative.
What auditors ask most often
-
“Show me all trails and prove log file validation is enabled everywhere.”
Hangup: incomplete trail inventory in multi-account setups. -
“How do you know it stays enabled?”
Hangup: one-time screenshots with no ongoing monitoring. -
“What about non-production, sandbox, or acquired environments?”
Hangup: scope creep. Decide and document what’s in scope and why. -
“Do you have centralized logging?”
Hangup: centralization is related, but not identical. Keep the response focused: validation enabled regardless of where logs land.
Fast audit-ready response format
- One table: trails x accounts x regions with validation flag
- One screenshot/export: Security Hub CloudTrail.4 summary and sample evidence 1
- One policy excerpt: logging baseline requires validation 2
Frequent implementation mistakes (and how to avoid them)
| Mistake | Why it fails audits | Avoid it by |
|---|---|---|
| Enabling validation on the “main” trail only | Other trails may exist and remain noncompliant | Inventory all trails, not just the org trail |
| Relying on console screenshots from months ago | No proof of ongoing operation | Store periodic exports + Security Hub CloudTrail.4 results 1 |
| Assuming Security Hub coverage equals full coverage | Aggregation or region gaps can miss trails | Reconcile Security Hub with independent trail inventory |
| No clear owner | Findings linger without remediation | Assign a named team and on-call rotation for logging controls |
| Exceptions granted informally | Exceptions become permanent | Require written approval, time bounds, and compensating controls |
Enforcement context and risk implications
No public enforcement cases are provided in the supplied sources for this specific CIS item, so you should treat it as a benchmark-aligned control expectation, not a standalone legal mandate with known penalties in this dataset 3.
Risk implications are still concrete:
- Investigation credibility risk: if log integrity is challenged, you may not be able to defend the timeline of actions in an incident.
- Customer audit friction: many enterprise security questionnaires ask for tamper-evident logging. A weak answer creates follow-up audits and remediation deadlines.
- Insider threat and privileged misuse: CloudTrail is a control-of-controls for IAM and administrative activity; integrity controls reduce the chance of undetected log manipulation after compromise.
Practical 30/60/90-day execution plan
Days 0–30: Establish baseline and close obvious gaps
- Assign control owner and document control statement mapped to CIS AWS Foundations v1.2 2.2 and Security Hub CloudTrail.4 3.
- Inventory all trails across accounts/regions in scope.
- Enable log file validation for every noncompliant trail.
- Create an evidence template (inventory export + configuration proof).
Days 31–60: Operationalize monitoring and response
- Enable/confirm Security Hub CIS evaluation and ingestion of CloudTrail.4 results to your ticketing workflow 1.
- Create a runbook: triage steps, who to page, how to re-enable, and how to document root cause.
- Decide on standard vs exception handling. Put exception approvals in your GRC workflow.
Days 61–90: Harden against drift and scale across the org
- Convert configuration to IaC where possible and restrict who can modify CloudTrail trails.
- Add periodic evidence capture (scheduled exports + Security Hub reporting) and store in your audit repository.
- Perform a tabletop audit: pick a random account and produce evidence within the time window your auditors usually allow.
- If you use Daydream, set this requirement up as a recurring control with automated evidence collection from Security Hub and a monthly trail configuration snapshot.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does enabling CloudTrail log file validation encrypt my CloudTrail logs?
No. Log file validation is an integrity feature that helps detect changes to delivered log files. Encryption is a separate control handled through S3 encryption and KMS key policies.
If I have an AWS Organizations trail, do I still need to check member accounts?
Yes. Member accounts can create additional trails, and those trails can be noncompliant. You need an inventory and monitoring approach that covers all trails in scope, not just the org trail.
What evidence is strongest for auditors: screenshots or API output?
API/CLI output and configuration exports are usually stronger because they are easier to reproduce and can cover all trails consistently. Pair that with Security Hub CloudTrail.4 results for continuous assurance 1.
How does AWS Security Hub test this requirement?
In the CIS mapping, Security Hub evaluates this as CloudTrail.4 1. Treat the finding status as a control signal, then keep separate configuration evidence for audit packages.
Do I need to validate the logs myself after enabling the setting?
The requirement is to enable the CloudTrail log file validation feature and manage it as an operating control. Your operational obligation is to keep it enabled, monitor for drift, and be able to produce evidence.
What should I do if a business unit claims validation breaks their workflow?
Ask for a concrete failure mode and reproduce it in a non-production account. If an exception is truly required, time-bound it, document compensating controls, and track remediation to return to baseline.
Related compliance topics
- 03.01.18: Access Control for Mobile Devices
- 03.01.19: Withdrawn
- 03.01.20: Use of External Systems
- 03.01.21: Withdrawn
- 03.01.22: Publicly Accessible Content
Footnotes
Frequently Asked Questions
Does enabling CloudTrail log file validation encrypt my CloudTrail logs?
No. Log file validation is an integrity feature that helps detect changes to delivered log files. Encryption is a separate control handled through S3 encryption and KMS key policies.
If I have an AWS Organizations trail, do I still need to check member accounts?
Yes. Member accounts can create additional trails, and those trails can be noncompliant. You need an inventory and monitoring approach that covers all trails in scope, not just the org trail.
What evidence is strongest for auditors: screenshots or API output?
API/CLI output and configuration exports are usually stronger because they are easier to reproduce and can cover all trails consistently. Pair that with Security Hub CloudTrail.4 results for continuous assurance (Source: AWS Security Hub CIS AWS Foundations mapping table).
How does AWS Security Hub test this requirement?
In the CIS mapping, Security Hub evaluates this as **CloudTrail.4** (Source: AWS Security Hub CIS AWS Foundations mapping table). Treat the finding status as a control signal, then keep separate configuration evidence for audit packages.
Do I need to validate the logs myself after enabling the setting?
The requirement is to enable the CloudTrail log file validation feature and manage it as an operating control. Your operational obligation is to keep it enabled, monitor for drift, and be able to produce evidence.
What should I do if a business unit claims validation breaks their workflow?
Ask for a concrete failure mode and reproduce it in a non-production account. If an exception is truly required, time-bound it, document compensating controls, and track remediation to return to baseline.
Operationalize this requirement
Map requirement text to controls, owners, evidence, and review workflows inside Daydream.
See Daydream