Safeguard 4.6: Securely Manage Enterprise Assets and Software

Safeguard 4.6 requires you to securely manage enterprise assets and software by putting defined, repeatable control operations around how assets/software are acquired, configured, authorized, maintained, and evidenced. To operationalize it quickly, document the control, assign ownership, enforce technical guardrails (inventory, configuration, access, patching), and capture recurring evidence that proves the controls run. 1

Key takeaways:

  • Treat Safeguard 4.6 as an “operating control”: defined process + technical enforcement + recurring evidence. 2
  • Scope includes endpoints, servers, cloud workloads, network devices, and the software that runs on them, including third-party software. 2
  • The fastest audit win is an evidence pack that ties inventory, authorization, configuration, and maintenance records to a single control narrative. 3

Safeguard 4.6: securely manage enterprise assets and software requirement is a practical control expectation: you need to show that the organization actively controls what assets exist, what software is allowed, and how both are kept in a known-good state. CIS Controls v8 frames this as an implementation expectation, so auditors and customers will look for two things: (1) technical reality (your tools and configurations) and (2) proof of operation over time (your artifacts). 1

For a CCO, GRC lead, or security compliance owner, the operational challenge is that “asset management” and “software management” often live across IT, security engineering, endpoint, cloud, and procurement. Safeguard 4.6 becomes fragile when ownership is unclear, when inventories don’t reconcile, or when software authorization is informal. Your goal is to make this control boring: define the standard, enforce it consistently, and keep evidence that a third party assessor can verify without heroics.

This page gives requirement-level implementation guidance: plain-English interpretation, applicability, step-by-step execution, evidence to retain, common audit questions, frequent mistakes, and an execution plan you can run without waiting for a full program redesign. 2

Regulatory text

Framework requirement (excerpt): “CIS Controls v8 safeguard 4.6 implementation expectation (Securely Manage Enterprise Assets and Software).” 1

Operator interpretation of the text: You must run a controlled lifecycle for enterprise assets and their software. That lifecycle needs guardrails (policy/standards), technical enforcement (inventory, configuration, authorization), and repeatable proof that the controls are operating (recurring evidence capture). 2

What an assessor expects you to be able to show:

  • You know what enterprise assets exist and who owns them. 2
  • You know what software exists, what is approved, and how unauthorized software is prevented or remediated. 2
  • You manage configuration and maintenance in a way that reduces security exposure and is measurable (patching and configuration are common anchor points). 3
  • You can produce artifacts that demonstrate operation, not just intent. 3

Plain-English interpretation (what the requirement really means)

Safeguard 4.6 is the discipline of controlling change and reducing unknowns across devices and software. If you cannot reliably answer “what do we have?” and “what is running?” you cannot consistently secure endpoints, servers, or cloud workloads.

In practice, you operationalize this by:

  1. maintaining a trustworthy asset and software inventory,
  2. defining what is allowed (approved software + standard configurations),
  3. enforcing that standard via tooling and access controls,
  4. remediating drift, and
  5. keeping evidence that the cycle repeats on a schedule. 1

Who it applies to

Entity scope: Enterprises and technology organizations aligning to CIS Controls v8. 2

Operational scope (what teams and environments are in-scope):

  • Corporate endpoints (managed laptops/desktops), mobile devices under management, and privileged workstations.
  • Servers (on-prem and cloud), cloud workloads (VMs, containers where applicable), and managed platform services where configuration is your responsibility.
  • Network devices and security appliances where you control configuration and firmware.
  • Software across all of the above, including third-party commercial software and internally built applications where they are deployed as enterprise software. 2

Common scoping decision: Start with “production + corporate” systems that touch sensitive data, regulated operations, or privileged access paths. Expand once the control runs smoothly. 3

What you actually need to do (step-by-step)

1) Assign ownership and define the control in one page

Create a single control write-up for Safeguard 4.6: securely manage enterprise assets and software requirement that includes:

  • Control owner (role, not name) and backup owner.
  • In-scope environments (endpoints, servers, cloud accounts/subscriptions, network).
  • In-scope data types or business processes (optional but useful for audits).
  • Tooling used (CMDB/asset inventory, endpoint management, vulnerability management, cloud inventory, app allowlisting if used).
  • How often you run key activities (inventory reconciliation, exception review, remediation tracking).
    This maps directly to the recommended approach: documented control operation plus recurring evidence capture. 1

2) Establish authoritative inventory sources (assets + software)

Operational requirement: pick a “system of record” for each domain and document it.

  • Enterprise assets: endpoint management platform, directory/IdP device records, cloud inventory, CMDB (if mature).
  • Software: endpoint telemetry, software inventory from device management, package managers, application catalogs.
    Then define reconciliation rules (for example, what happens when an asset appears in endpoint telemetry but not in procurement records). Keep the reconciliation outputs as evidence. 2

3) Define “approved” and “prohibited” software rules

You need an operational mechanism to distinguish:

  • Approved software (business-justified and supported),
  • Restricted software (requires approval, additional hardening, or special licensing),
  • Prohibited software (known risky categories or unlicensed software).

Write this as a standard that security and IT can enforce. If you use a ticketing workflow, define who can approve exceptions and how exceptions expire. 3

4) Enforce secure configuration and authorized change paths

This is where “securely manage” becomes real:

  • Require managed configuration baselines for endpoints and servers (policy-based settings, configuration profiles, golden images, infrastructure-as-code).
  • Limit who can install software, especially on privileged/admin endpoints.
  • Route software deployments through managed tools (MDM/UEM, endpoint management, software deployment tooling, or controlled repositories).
    Document the enforcement points (GPO/MDM profiles, admin rights controls, allowlisting rules if applicable, cloud policy guardrails). 2

5) Build a remediation workflow for drift and unauthorized items

Define what happens when you detect:

  • Unknown assets,
  • End-of-life assets,
  • Unauthorized software,
  • Misconfigured systems.

Your workflow should specify triage, owner notification, remediation action, and closure criteria. Keep a sample of closed tickets as operating evidence. 2

6) Implement recurring evidence capture (audit readiness)

Create a lightweight evidence schedule tied to the control write-up:

  • Inventory export snapshots (assets + software) with timestamps.
  • Exception register (approved deviations) with approvals.
  • Remediation tickets for unauthorized software and asset anomalies.
  • Configuration baseline reports or policy compliance reports. Store these in a control evidence folder with consistent naming. Daydream fits naturally here by mapping Safeguard 4.6 to a documented control operation and prompting recurring evidence capture so you are not rebuilding proof at audit time. 1

Required evidence and artifacts to retain

Keep artifacts that prove both design (what you intended) and operation (what happened):

  • Safeguard 4.6 control narrative (owner, scope, tools, frequency). 2
  • Asset inventory exports (authoritative sources identified; include timestamps). 3
  • Software inventory exports and an “approved software” standard/list (or equivalent policy). 2
  • Configuration baseline documentation (endpoint/server standards; cloud policy standards where applicable). 2
  • Exception register (who approved, business justification, expiry/renewal rule). 3
  • Remediation records: tickets for unauthorized software removal, asset quarantine, configuration drift fixes. 2
  • Access control evidence for software install rights (e.g., admin group membership review outputs). 2

Common exam/audit questions and hangups

Expect these questions, and pre-build answers with evidence pointers:

  • “Show me you know your current asset population.” Auditors often test by sampling systems from network logs, EDR, or cloud and asking where they appear in your inventory. 2
  • “How do you prevent unauthorized software?” If you only detect after-the-fact, document the detection-to-remediation SLA you follow and show closed examples. 3
  • “Who can approve exceptions, and do exceptions expire?” A perpetual exception list reads as lack of control. Keep expirations and renewals documented. 2
  • “What’s your proof this runs repeatedly?” A single snapshot is weak; recurring exports/tickets are stronger. Daydream-style recurring evidence capture resolves this quickly. 3

Frequent implementation mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Mistake Why it fails in audits Fix
Inventory is “best effort” with no system of record Sampling exposes gaps and duplicates Declare authoritative sources and reconciliation rules; retain reconciliation outputs. 2
Approved software exists only as tribal knowledge No consistent enforcement, hard to test Publish an approved/restricted/prohibited standard and tie it to deployment controls. 3
Exceptions never expire Exceptions become the operating model Add expiry, review cadence, and re-approval requirements; keep an exception register. 2
Evidence is assembled at audit time Missing timestamps, incomplete proof Set recurring evidence capture with naming conventions and owners; automate exports where possible. 2
Tools exist, but ownership is unclear Remediation stalls, drift persists Assign a control owner and operational owners by environment (endpoint, server, cloud). 3

Enforcement context and risk implications

No public enforcement cases were provided in the source catalog for this safeguard, so you should treat it as a framework-driven control expectation rather than a directly enforced rule in the provided materials. 1

Risk-wise, weak asset and software management increases the chance that:

  • unmanaged assets bypass security controls,
  • unauthorized or vulnerable software persists,
  • configuration drift creates inconsistent security posture,
  • incident response loses time because inventories are incomplete.
    These are operational risks that often become compliance findings when you cannot produce evidence of control operation. 2

A practical execution plan (30/60/90-day)

First 30 days (stabilize scope + proof)

  • Name the control owner and write the one-page Safeguard 4.6 control narrative. 2
  • Define in-scope environments and authoritative inventory sources for assets and software. 3
  • Produce baseline exports (asset inventory + software inventory) and store them as your initial evidence set. 2
  • Stand up an exception register template and start logging exceptions immediately. 2

By 60 days (enforcement + workflow)

  • Publish the approved/restricted/prohibited software standard and connect it to a request/approval workflow. 2
  • Implement or tighten install-rights controls on endpoints where feasible; document the enforcement method. 3
  • Define remediation workflow for unauthorized software and unknown assets; show closed tickets as evidence. 2

By 90 days (repeatability + audit-ready pack)

  • Schedule recurring evidence captures (inventory snapshots, exception review outputs, remediation reports). 2
  • Run at least one exception review cycle and document outcomes (renewed, expired, remediated). 3
  • Build an “audit packet” folder with: control narrative, last snapshots, sample tickets, exception register, and configuration compliance reports. Daydream can maintain this mapping and evidence cadence so the packet stays current. 1

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Safeguard 4.6 require a CMDB?

CIS does not mandate a specific tool in the provided excerpt; it requires secure management and proof of operation. Use whatever inventory sources are authoritative in your environment, then document and reconcile them. 2

How do we handle SaaS applications and browser extensions?

Treat them as software that can introduce risk. Define what’s approved, how approval happens, and how you detect and remediate unauthorized installs, then retain evidence of that workflow. 3

What evidence is most persuasive to auditors?

Time-stamped inventory exports, a living exception register with approvals and expirations, and remediation tickets that show detection through closure. Pair those artifacts to a short control narrative so the evidence is interpretable. 2

Our IT team can’t block all unauthorized software. Are we noncompliant?

You can still meet the intent if you have reliable detection, a documented approval/exception path, and a consistent remediation process with evidence. Document the gap as a risk decision and show compensating controls and ticket history. 2

How do we scope cloud assets under Safeguard 4.6?

Include cloud accounts/subscriptions/projects and the workloads you deploy. Identify your cloud inventory source, define configuration standards (policy-as-code where applicable), and retain compliance reports and remediation records. 2

Where does Daydream fit operationally?

Daydream is most valuable where teams fail audits: mapping Safeguard 4.6 to a documented control operation and maintaining recurring evidence capture so control proof is current and consistent. 1

Footnotes

  1. CIS Controls v8; CIS Controls Navigator v8

  2. CIS Controls v8

  3. CIS Controls Navigator v8

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Safeguard 4.6 require a CMDB?

CIS does not mandate a specific tool in the provided excerpt; it requires secure management and proof of operation. Use whatever inventory sources are authoritative in your environment, then document and reconcile them. (Source: CIS Controls v8)

How do we handle SaaS applications and browser extensions?

Treat them as software that can introduce risk. Define what’s approved, how approval happens, and how you detect and remediate unauthorized installs, then retain evidence of that workflow. (Source: CIS Controls Navigator v8)

What evidence is most persuasive to auditors?

Time-stamped inventory exports, a living exception register with approvals and expirations, and remediation tickets that show detection through closure. Pair those artifacts to a short control narrative so the evidence is interpretable. (Source: CIS Controls v8)

Our IT team can’t block all unauthorized software. Are we noncompliant?

You can still meet the intent if you have reliable detection, a documented approval/exception path, and a consistent remediation process with evidence. Document the gap as a risk decision and show compensating controls and ticket history. (Source: CIS Controls v8)

How do we scope cloud assets under Safeguard 4.6?

Include cloud accounts/subscriptions/projects and the workloads you deploy. Identify your cloud inventory source, define configuration standards (policy-as-code where applicable), and retain compliance reports and remediation records. (Source: CIS Controls v8)

Where does Daydream fit operationally?

Daydream is most valuable where teams fail audits: mapping Safeguard 4.6 to a documented control operation and maintaining recurring evidence capture so control proof is current and consistent. (Source: CIS Controls v8; CIS Controls Navigator v8)

Operationalize this requirement

Map requirement text to controls, owners, evidence, and review workflows inside Daydream.

See Daydream