Asset and configuration controls

The HITRUST asset and configuration controls requirement means you must maintain a complete asset inventory and enforce secure, standardized configurations across the full lifecycle, with proof that controls operate in practice. Operationalize it by defining configuration baselines, continuously discovering assets, controlling configuration changes, and retaining audit-ready evidence of coverage, exceptions, and remediation ¹.

Key takeaways:

• You need an accurate, owned asset inventory tied to lifecycle events (onboard, change, retire) and periodic reconciliation.
• You need enforceable configuration standards (baselines) plus change control, exception handling, and drift detection.
• Audits fail on missing evidence: show coverage, approvals, scan results, and remediation, not just policies.

“Asset and configuration controls” is one of those requirements that looks straightforward until you try to prove it in an assessment. HITRUST assessors typically expect two things: (1) you know what assets you have (including cloud, endpoints, and “shadow” systems), and (2) those assets stay in a secure configuration state over time, not just on deployment day ¹.

For a Compliance Officer, CCO, or GRC lead, the work is less about writing a policy and more about turning security and IT operations into repeatable, evidenced processes. You need ownership and a system of record for assets. You need configuration baselines that map to your environment (servers, workstations, network devices, cloud services, containers, and SaaS admin settings). You need a way to manage exceptions without losing control. Most importantly, you need artifacts that show the process runs: discovery outputs, baseline documents, change tickets, approvals, drift reports, and remediation records.

This page gives requirement-level implementation guidance you can hand to IT/SecOps, then collect the evidence you’ll need for HITRUST-aligned assurance ¹.

Regulatory text

Provided excerpt (summary-level): “Baseline implementation-intent summary derived from publicly available framework overviews; licensed standard text is not reproduced in this record.” The implementation intent is: “Manage assets and secure configurations through lifecycle.” Reference: HITRUST-03 ¹.

What the operator must do:
Treat “assets” and “configurations” as governed objects with lifecycle controls:

• Maintain an inventory that is accurate enough to drive security controls (patching, EDR, vulnerability scanning, access control, encryption).
• Define “secure configuration” for each asset class, implement it, and keep assets from drifting.
• Control changes, approve exceptions, and document what changed, why, and who approved it.
• Prove all of the above with evidence of operation, not intent ¹.

Plain-English interpretation (what this requirement really asks)

You can’t secure what you can’t find, and you can’t prove security if configurations are ad hoc. This requirement expects you to:

1. Know your environment: continuously discover and track assets, including cloud resources and third-party managed components that process your data.
2. Standardize how assets are built: define configuration baselines (secure builds) for each platform and service.
3. Prevent and detect drift: monitor configuration state, detect deviations, and remediate or formally accept risk.
4. Make changes controlled and auditable: changes follow a process; “break glass” exists but leaves a trail.

Who it applies to

Entity types: healthcare organizations and service providers pursuing HITRUST-aligned assurance activities ¹.

Operational context where this bites hardest:

• Hybrid environments (on-prem + multiple clouds) where inventory sources disagree.
• Fast-changing infrastructure (autoscaling, containers, ephemeral instances) where “point-in-time” inventories go stale.
• Third parties hosting systems or administering SaaS where you still need configuration assurance evidence.
• M&A or rapid onboarding where asset ownership and baselines are inconsistent.

Teams you’ll need involved: IT Ops, SecOps, Cloud/platform engineering, Endpoint management, Network engineering, Change management, and GRC to coordinate evidence and exception governance.

What you actually need to do (step-by-step)

1) Define scope and ownership (start here)

1. Name your asset system of record (CMDB or inventory platform) and define what “in scope” means (prod vs non-prod, corporate endpoints, network gear, cloud accounts/subscriptions).
2. Assign asset owners by asset class and environment (endpoints, servers, cloud resources, network, SaaS). Ownership needs to include lifecycle actions: onboarding, patching, hardening, and retirement.
3. Define minimum asset attributes you will require to call an asset “known.” Practical fields: unique ID, hostname/resource ID, environment, business service, data sensitivity, owner, location/account, and lifecycle state.

Deliverable: an asset inventory standard plus an ownership RACI.

2) Establish authoritative inventory feeds and reconcile

1. Select discovery sources that cover your reality (endpoint management, cloud inventory, vulnerability scanner, network discovery, identity directory, container registry).
2. Normalize and deduplicate so the same asset is not counted three times.
3. Reconcile regularly: detect “unknown” assets (seen in scanners but not in CMDB) and “stale” assets (in CMDB but not observed).
4. Create a process for onboarding and decommissioning: inventory updates must be triggered by procurement, provisioning pipelines, and offboarding.

Evidence focus: reconciliation reports, exception queues, and closure records.

3) Define secure configuration baselines by asset class

1. Create baseline standards for each major class:
   • Endpoints (Windows/macOS)
   • Servers (Windows/Linux)
   • Network devices
   • Cloud (account/subscription guardrails, logging, storage protections, key management settings)
   • SaaS admin configurations (MFA, SSO, audit logging, least privilege roles)
2. Write baselines as testable requirements, not prose. Example format:
   • Setting name
   • Expected value/state
   • How it’s enforced/checked (GPO/MDM policy ID, IaC policy, scanner control)
   • Exception path
3. Tie baselines to build processes: golden images, configuration management, and infrastructure-as-code policies.

Practical tip: keep a “baseline index” that lists each baseline, the version, approval date, and where enforcement lives.

4) Implement configuration enforcement and drift detection

1. Enforce on endpoints/servers via MDM/GPO/config management.
2. Enforce in cloud using policy-as-code/guardrails and standardized landing zones.
3. Scan for drift using configuration compliance tooling and/or vulnerability/configuration scanners.
4. Route drift findings into ticketing with SLAs you define internally, and require documented closure (remediated, accepted risk, or false positive with justification).

Assessors will look for closed-loop operations: detection → ticket → fix → verification.

5) Formalize change control and exception handling

1. Define what changes require approval (baseline changes, security agent removal, firewall rule changes, privileged role changes, logging disablement).
2. Implement emergency change (“break glass”) rules: allow fast action, then require retrospective approval and documentation.
3. Build an exception register:
   • Asset(s) affected
   • Baseline requirement waived
   • Business justification
   • Compensating controls
   • Expiration/review date and approver

Exception hygiene is where programs degrade. Treat exceptions as time-bound, reviewed items.

6) Prove lifecycle control (onboard, maintain, retire)

1. Onboarding: asset appears in inventory, gets correct baseline, gets monitoring agents, gets tagged/owned.
2. Maintenance: drift detection runs; changes are ticketed and approved.
3. Retirement: asset removed from service, access revoked, monitoring removed, inventory updated, data handling documented where applicable.

Required evidence and artifacts to retain

Use this as your audit evidence checklist:

Asset inventory

• Asset inventory export from system of record (current snapshot)
• Data dictionary for required asset fields
• Ownership/RACI for asset classes
• Reconciliation reports showing detection of unknown/stale assets and resolution tickets

Configuration standards

• Baseline configuration documents (by asset class) with versioning and approval
• Build standards (golden image references, IaC modules, hardened templates)
• Configuration compliance reports (pass/fail by asset group)
• Drift findings with remediation tickets and closure proof

Change and exception governance

• Change management policy/procedure covering configuration changes
• Sample change tickets showing approvals and implementation evidence
• Exception register with approvals and periodic reviews

Operational proof

• Meeting notes or dashboards used to review compliance posture
• Evidence of follow-up actions (tickets, change records, risk acceptances)

Common exam/audit questions and hangups

Questions you should be ready for:

• “Show me your authoritative asset inventory, and explain how you know it’s complete.”
• “How do you handle ephemeral cloud assets that appear and disappear?”
• “Where are your configuration baselines, and how do you enforce them?”
• “How do you detect and remediate configuration drift?”
• “Show exceptions. Who approves them, and how do they expire?”
• “Prove this is operating: give me samples across different asset types.”

Hangups that cause findings:

• Inventory exists but has no owners, no lifecycle state, and no reconciliation.
• Baselines are generic PDFs without enforcement mapping.
• Drift detection exists, but tickets don’t close or verification is missing.
• Exceptions are informal (email threads) and never revisited.

Frequent implementation mistakes (and how to avoid them)

1. Mistake: treating inventory as a one-time project.
   Fix: establish continuous discovery feeds and a reconciliation queue owned by IT/SecOps.

2. Mistake: baselines that cannot be tested.
   Fix: write baselines as controls with a check method and enforcement reference (policy ID, scanner rule, IaC guardrail).

3. Mistake: ignoring SaaS and cloud configuration.
   Fix: include SaaS admin settings and cloud guardrails as first-class baselines, not “future work.”

4. Mistake: exception sprawl.
   Fix: require expirations and periodic review; treat exception renewal as a new approval.

5. Mistake: evidence scattered across tools with no narrative.
   Fix: maintain an “assessment binder” per baseline: standard, enforcement method, latest report, sample tickets, exceptions.

Enforcement context and risk implications

No public enforcement cases were provided in the source catalog for this requirement, so you should treat this primarily as an assurance and audit-readiness risk area rather than cite specific case outcomes ¹.

Operational risk is still direct:

• Unknown assets often miss security agents, patching, and monitoring.
• Misconfigurations are a common root cause in security incidents; configuration control reduces exposure by standardizing secure states and catching drift.
• Weak change control creates gaps between written standards and production reality.

Practical 30/60/90-day execution plan

Days 0–30: establish control design and minimum viable evidence

• Name the system of record for assets; define required asset fields and ownership.
• Identify your top discovery feeds (endpoint, cloud, vuln scanner) and start reconciling differences.
• Publish initial baselines for two highest-risk asset classes (commonly endpoints and cloud accounts).
• Stand up an exception register and define approval roles.

Deliverables: inventory standard, baseline v1 set, exception register v1, first reconciliation report.

Days 31–60: implement enforcement and closed-loop remediation

• Implement baseline enforcement for the initial asset classes (MDM/GPO, cloud guardrails).
• Start drift detection reporting on a cadence you can sustain.
• Route drift findings into ticketing; require closure with verification notes.
• Expand baselines to servers and one critical SaaS platform.

Deliverables: compliance reports, sample remediation tickets, change records tied to baseline changes.

Days 61–90: scale coverage, harden lifecycle, prepare assessor-ready packaging

• Expand inventory coverage to network devices and remaining critical platforms.
• Formalize onboarding/offboarding triggers so inventory and baselines are applied automatically where possible.
• Run an internal “evidence dry run”: select samples across environments and produce a cohesive evidence packet.
• If you use Daydream, map assets and baselines to a single control narrative, track exceptions, and generate assessor-ready evidence requests without hunting across tools.

Deliverables: end-to-end lifecycle artifacts, evidence binder per baseline, management review dashboard, complete exception governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

How complete does my asset inventory need to be for this requirement?

Complete enough to drive security operations: you should be able to show you can discover assets, assign ownership, and reconcile unknown/stale items with documented resolution. Auditors usually focus on whether gaps are identified and closed with a repeatable process ¹.

Do cloud resources and containers count as assets?

Yes in practice, because they affect your security posture and often host or process regulated data. Treat them as inventory objects with lifecycle states, tags/owners, and baseline guardrails ¹.

What counts as a “configuration baseline” versus a policy?

A baseline is testable and enforceable: it lists required settings and how you verify them on real systems. A policy can set expectations, but assessors typically want evidence that baselines exist and are applied ¹.

How should we handle exceptions without failing the control?

Maintain a formal exception register with business justification, compensating controls, approver, and an expiration or review trigger. Keep evidence that exceptions are reviewed and either remediated or renewed through governance.

We outsource infrastructure to a third party. Are we still on the hook?

You still need assurance that assets are inventoried and configurations are controlled for systems in scope. Contract terms, third-party attestations, shared dashboards, and ticket evidence can support this, but you need a clear shared responsibility model.

What evidence is most persuasive in an assessment?

Current inventory exports, baseline documents with approvals, automated compliance/drift reports, and a small set of end-to-end samples showing detection through remediation. Samples across different asset classes reduce follow-up questions.

Related compliance topics

• 2025 SEC Marketing Rule Examination Focus Areas
• Access and identity controls
• Access Control (AC)
• Access control and identity discipline
• Access control management

Footnotes

1. HITRUST certification overview